![]() Different ground units (AAA, pillboxes, different types of tanks and ships ) with different damageability from different weapons.Ģ0. Dynamical ground units (AI controlled) effectively participating in battle and avoiding attacks.ġ9. Possibility of win by bombing enemy base with bombers.ġ8. Plane repair and ammo recharge on captured or own airfields.ġ7. Takeoffs and landings on airfields, aircraft carriers and water (for hydroplanes)ġ6. Gunner view, optional manual gunner control.ġ4. Cockpit view (for all fighters, soon for bombers), bombsight, view from the bomb or torpedo.ġ3. Choose your plane, ammo type, bomb loadout etc before or in the process of battle.ġ1. Even if you was rammed by idiot teammate or crashed in first minute - just jump to another plane.ĩ. Free repair of planes in hangar over time.Ĩ. Higher tier planes can be destroyed by lower tier because there is no artificial hit points boosting (no static hp bars)ħ. Battle result depends from personal skill. You dont need to buy dozens of hangar slots for planes and re-train crews using real money.Ħ. Any crew from hangar can be trained to fly any plane simultaneously. Main hangar unit - crew, not slot for the plane. New planes that will be introduced in next patches will be available immediately, without grinding.ĥ. After new level you can buy all planes of that rank. Leveling system in which you level not specific plane trees, but overall nation level. Combat altitude only limited by plane ceiling characteristics.Ĥ. Atmosphere is not limited by vertical artificially. Different battle modes with different tasks and objectives.Ģ. What War Thunder have, and World of Warplanes doesn't:ġ. Sorry for mistakes, I learned English in teh Internet s. ![]() We cannot possibly know the real identity of the user with the Challenger 2 document, but many War Thunder players are serving in the armies of various countries, so everything is possible.My brief translation from russian compilation. "When a user publishes a classified document at the official forum of War Thunder, we delete it as soon as possible. ![]() "We use only documents that are non-classified when we work on our game," Gaijin Entertainment explained in an email. Unfortunately for the dedicated War Thunder player in question, their efforts to make the Challenger 2 a tougher tank were for naught: The documents posted may have been accurate, but because they're classified, they're not acceptable as "valid source material" and so no changes will be made. Maybe best of all, though, it seems that while sharing classified MoD documents in the War Thunder forums might be a violation of the Official Secrets Act, is it apparently not a bannable offense: The account that posted the images is still valid and, by all appearances, in good standing. This is also apparently not the first time something like this has happened: In its initial response to the post, community manager Smin1080p wrote, "Last time such a document was shared that was claimed to be 'unclassified' it was in fact still classified and was confirmed that it should never have been shared." How many times have people shared classified military secrets in the War Thunder forums? For one thing, it all started over a dispute in the size of the gap between the main turret structure and hull-a minute detail, you might think, but one that this guy takes very seriously. It's also possible that this isn't a nefarious act of treason in pursuit of a better videogame experience, but simply an error in declassification.īut even if it was an honest mistake, the entire incident is fascinating. It's not known yet whether the player in question is actually a tank commander, or a member of the UK military at all, although as the UK Defense Journal notes, their claimed location of Tidworth, Wiltshire is the home of the Royal Tank Regiment, which operates Challenger 2s. ![]() Every time you post this you place us (International representatives of Gaijin), especially any UK citizens, in hot water as the warning so helpfully states that unauthorised retention of a protected document is an offence." "Of this you are already aware, as a service person you have signed a declaration that you understand the act and what actions it compels you to take. "By continuing to disseminate it you are in violation of the Official Secrets Act as stated by the warning on the cover of the document, an offence which can carry up to a 14 year prison sentence if prosecuted," the moderator wrote in response to the classified post.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |